Specialized S-Works Shoe Review

2013 Specialized S-Works Road Shoe

2013 Specialized S-Works Road Shoe

I determined that my Sidi’s were not going to last another season and thought the S-Works would be a nice return to innocence. After all, the Specialized “Pro” model from 2000 was my first real road biking shoe. Around the turn of the century, Specialized was advocating a different type of bike-wear product. They worked with scientists, physical therapists, kinesiologists and tried to create new products that looked slightly weird and different, but touted (and justified) the new products as a better fit than anything they’ve ever used in the past. They called this ‘Body Geometry’. Those old pair old first generation ‘Body Geometry’ shoes that I probably purchased from around $150 had such a nice insole that when I got a new pair of shoes I decided I would keep the insole. Then I wore out those shoes and portage the insole to the new shoes…. a trend that continued to today. I don’t know exactly how many miles, km, or watts have been pushed down on them, but it has to be somewhere over 60,000 miles.

Specialized has been pushed into a bad spot this year after they thought they could count on a Chinese manufacturer to produce their top-end road shoes. The same shoes that would be used in the Tour de France and by discerning customers. The first batch turned out ok, so Specialized was able to put the 2013 S-Works Road Shoe out to market around September 2012. Sometime around November or December they were impossible to find in the US. The trend continued through the winter… and the spring.

Turns out, China was up to their old tricks of turning out the best possible initial quality, then following up (once contracts and mass production ensues) with mediocre quality. I was disappointed to find it impossible to find an S-Works shoe after searching for over 6 months… but I applaud Specialized for seeing the mediocre product and determining that it wasn’t good enough. In my head, there is a corporate meeting at Specialized where they have the sloppy Chinese shoe in hand, and they say “Can we charge $400 USD or 350 EUR for this?” Only the imagination can say what came next, but apparently Specialized turned back the order from the manufacturer while customers waited, and waited, and waited.

Dear Specialized,
Are you having a good experience with Chinese manufacturing your top end shoe?
Saving money, though. Nice! China gets the product to the consumer just the same as USA, France, or Italy. Right?
Oh.
Awkward.
I'll step away now.

So I got my hands on the 2013 Version 2 shoe, after they denied the second batch from China. It’s a nice shoe. It’s very light, which is partly why I purchased it over other shoes. Some have said that it feels fragile. I think any light shoe will “feel” fragile. But bits of durability in the right place can go far. Looking at the shoe, I noticed that the toe bumper was very subtle. Experience tells me that a big toe-bumper is good thing.

Next is the heel cup. It feels fine riding. Very good infact. But my old Sidi’s have a plastic heel cup and it’s full of crazy scrapes and gouges. The outer heel cup doesn’t feel as robust as a Sidi shoe, but it’s hard to tell if that is a long-term issue.

S-Works Road Shoe Heel

S-Works Road Shoe Heel

The BOA system is really awesome. I’m a big fan already. It does have a shelf-life, but apparently it’s easy to replace and very light compared to strap systems. I’m also thinking that my next MTB shoe will certainly be BOA. Sure, road bike shoe velco may dislatch from time to time, but mountain biking in the mud pushes the limits of velcro. Since laces cannot be adjusted on the fly, the BOA system seems ideal.

Specialized S-Works BOA System

Specialized S-Works BOA System

Looks.
We’ll start the least interesting part. I ordered the black/white version only because the red/white version reminded me too much of blood, or lipstick, or roadkill, or fresh roadkill with lipstick. Hard to say. The black/white version has a big black streak down the middle of shoe. I think it probably looks fine from afar and maybe it’s because I’ve had white shoes for so many years… but I didn’t like the black highlights. I also smelled a fresh skunk on my first ride… maybe because it thought the S-Works were a posh relative.

Size.
Specialized, and most notably several forums, say that you should order 1 EU size down for the newest S-Works shoe if you are coming from Sidi (or perhaps another brand). I tried going 1 size down and it wasn’t even close… way too small. In the end, I ordered the same size as my Sidi shoes and it seemed like a good fit.

Weight.
Yup, these are some light shoes. I did a lazy 62 mile ride in 3hrs 2 minutes and was feeling bad from the start but I did notice the weight. At over 400 grams lighter than my old Sidi shoes (Genius 5.5 or something) it was most noticeable on acceleration.

S-Works Shoes Weight (42)

S-Works Shoes Weight (42)


Fit.
Footbed Size: S-Works vs Sidi

Footbed Size: S-Works vs Sidi


The footbed is tiny. Think ballerina shoe. Think European ballerina. Oh wait. Come back. Yes, it’s svelte but I don’t have wide feet and they are very low profile too. I’ve been using 2 footbeds in every cycling shoe to date just to raise my foot to the appropriate level. Maybe this could be good?

Fit – Footbed and Insole.

2001 Pro Body Geometry vs S-Works 2013 Insole

S-Works 2013 vs 2001 Pro Body Geometry Insole


I have flat feet. It’s generally not an issue but the lack of arches can get one out of a wartime draft so I’m sticking with them (you never know). The old Specialized footbeds worked well for me. I really liked the raised section in the middle of the foot just before the toes. As long as I don’t have any ankle swelling this insole is great for me. However, the newer S-Works insole has very little raise (if any) and it’s also pushed back onto the center of the foot.
Specialized Pro Body Geometry Insole (2000)

Specialized Pro Body Geometry Insole (2000)

Specialized S-Works Insole (2013/2014)

Specialized S-Works Insole (2013/2014)

The Ride.
It was apparent early that the narrow footbed wasn’t working for me. It felt as though the shoe was trying to take something flat and form it into something tubular.

The Wrap Up:

S-Works Carbon Sole

S-Works Carbon Sole


I realize now after seeing the S-Works design that my flat feet make me a bad candidate. The quality of the unidirectional carbon sole is great! The upper material is very supple but the BOA system keeps it from being flexy. Both big wins! Some companies have better systems to prevent damage to the shoe with plastic outer heel cups or bigger toe bumpers but for riders who don’t have issues with heel rub on the chainstay or bump toes from time to time. The 2013 S-Works shoe (or is it the 2014 shoe now with the difference in manufacturing?) it’s an exquisite shoe. If I had arches… I’d order a second pair.

The Verdict:
I’ve decided it’s not the shoe for me. Although I hate the look of Bont shoes (they look like little boats don’t they?) I think that’s where I’m headed. The ugly flat shoe for the ugly flat foot seems like a “Beauty and the Beast” story ending so thats where we’ll leave it.

P1040155

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Equipment & Parts and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Specialized S-Works Shoe Review

  1. marcates says:

    Nice review. i am looking at these for my first pair of real road shoes. Specialized has other foot beds available. It come with a low arch (red). There is a blue (medium) and green (high). So you may need to try a different footbed. There are also shims. My local Specialized shop has guys that have gone through the BG training. They can help with all of this.

    • thewaywardcyclist says:

      Interesting, I did not know about the optional bits. It appears that I already had the low arch (red) insoles? Theoretically this would be the best fit for me so I’m surprised the fit was so poor. To date, this is the only pair of cycling shoes that I found unacceptable. I recently got a pair of Spiuk ZS15 shoes (in addition to my Bont Vaypor+ shoes) which are quite nice.. haven’t got around to a review yet.

      • Kyle says:

        Actually, someone with low arches might need more support (like a blue or even green insert). People with “low arches” often have arches the flatted out when weight is put on them, due to lack of support… giving the illusion of a low arch.

        Not saying that is the case with you, but it’s something to consider. The increased support footbeds often feel quite odd when starting out. But, you quickly get used to them and you’re feet (mine at least) will thank you 🙂

  2. George says:

    Try the green arches to give your flat feet more support, you can throw a shim in each side to see if that helps also, I have a pair of 2012’s and they are great.

  3. thewaywardcyclist says:

    Hey George! It’s funny but after 20 years of cycling and a dozen shoes, including Specialized, the S-Works is the only cycling shoe that I was forced to return. I know pro’s use them. I also know pro cyclists get special treatment and they all have custom shoes that are not made in China like yours and mine are. Perhaps I got a stinky shoe. Thankfully Specialized has a great return policy, but if I were CEO of the S-show, I think I would produce the top end gear in an area closer to the customers to keep an eye on the output. I’m generally a ‘happy to please’ foot. However, I’d put hard-earned money that if I sent you the S-Works I received and you would come to the same conclusion that it’s a horribly narrow shoe regardless of the footbed.
    For disclosure, my shoe size is 42 and my width is “Medium” or “Narrow”… my shoes are the small ones in the closet compared to my wife who trumps my Dutch heritage by 3 sizes. I’ve enjoyed Specialized Pro (2002 vintage), numerous Sidi (since 1998), Bont, Spuik. But the new S-Works is a rotten apple given the hype in my mind.

  4. Hi there to every body, it’s my first pay a visit of this webpage; this blog
    consists of awesome and in fact excellent material designed for readers.

Write a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s